Evaluation criterias

I. Group
Capacity
The applicant / partner has sufficient capacity to implement the project in accordance with the Application Guidelines
Criteria Leads to rejection
1.
Administrative Capacity - The project implementation team is conformed with the specificity and volume of the project activities set out
Yes
2.
Beneficiary's financial capacity - The Beneficiary can provide the necessary financing / co-financing for the implementation of the project activities 
-	In cases when the applicant is a first level budget spending unit, this fact is verified officially.
-	In cases when the applicant is a second level budget spending unit, this fact is proved by a letter of support from the respective first level budget spending unit confirming that the particular beneficiary has the necessary financial resources for the current financial year for implementation of the project, which are higher than the amount of the grant requested. 
-	In cases when the applicant is different from a first/second level budget spending unit, the financial capacity is evaluated in accordance with the attached Balance sheet and Profit and loss account for the current financial year. 
(Declaration of commitment for providing of funds for co-financing of the project - if applicable)
Yes
3.
Financial capacity of the partner (s) - Applicable only in cases when the partner (s) spend funds under the project.
-	In cases when a Bulgarian partner is a first level budget spending unit, this fact is verified officially. In cases when a foreign partner is a first level budget spending unit, this fact is verified by the information provided to the project proposal containing the amount of the approved expenditure in the budget of the first level budget spending unit for the current financial year, which amount is higher than the amount of the requested grant spent by the partner.
-	In cases when a partner is a second level budget spending unit, this fact is proved by a letter of support from the respective first level budget spending unit confirming that the partner has the necessary financial resources for the current financial year for the implementation of the project, which are higher than the amount of the requested grant spent by the partner.
-	In cases when the partner is different from a first/second level budget spending unit with budget appropriations, the financial capacity is evaluated in accordance with:
•	Attached Balance sheet and Profit and loss account for the current financial year – for Bulgarian partners
OR
•	Relevant accounting document regulated by the International or National Accounting Standards of the respective member state for the current year - applicable to the foreign partners.
The financial capacity of each partner is being evaluated separately (for which it is applicable).
No
4.
Operational capacity 
- The Beneficiary has at least 3 years of experience in management / implementation of projects and/or experience in performing activities similar to those included in the project proposal.
Yes
5.
The operational capacity of the partner (s) 
- The Partners have at least 3 years of experience in management / implementation of projects and / or experience in performing activities similar to those included in the project proposal.
No
II. Group
Compliance - Description and justification of the objectives of the project
Criteria Leads to rejection
1.
The formulated specific objectives are in line with the objectives in the Application Guidelines
Yes
2.
The objectives set out aim at addressing the needs of the target groups according to the Application Guidelines
Yes
3.
There is a clear connection between the project objectives and the envisaged project results
Yes
III. Group
Compliance - Description of the target groups under the project and their needs
Criteria Leads to rejection
1.
The target groups are specified - their specific characteristics are indicated according to the Application Guidelines
Yes
2.
The needs of the target groups are identified.
Yes
IV. Group
Methodology and organization - Conformity of the activities with the objectives and expected results
Criteria Leads to rejection
1.
The activities aim at achieving the objectives
Yes
2.
The expected results from the implementation of the activities will contribute to achievement of the indicators set out in the project
Yes
3.
The activities as well as the ways and stages of their implementation are described in detail
No
4.
At least one innovative practice is identified and / or applied in the activities
Yes
5.
The plan for public procurement corresponds to the sequence of the foreseen activities
No
V. Group
Methodology and organization - Transparency of the activities’ implementation
Criteria Leads to rejection
1.
The description of the activities indicates start date and duration of each activity
No
2.
The time coverage of each activity is realistic
No
3.
There is a logical consistency in the implementation of the activities
No
VI. Group
Methodology and organization - Preparedness for starting up the project (if applicable)
Criteria Leads to rejection
1.
All preconditions for starting up the project are fulfilled
No
VII. Group
Methodology and organization - Adequate measures for ensuring the sustainability of the project results are foreseen
Criteria Leads to rejection
1.
Adequate measures for ensuring the sustainability of the project results are foreseen.
Yes
VIII. Group
Bilateral relationships
Criteria Leads to rejection
1.
The partner (s) is involved in the implementation of the activities in accordance with their capacity and commitments
No
2.
The funds envisaged for spending by the partner (s) meet the requirements of the Eligibility Expenditure Regulation
No
3.
The funds envisaged for spending by the partner (s) are sufficient for the quality and timely performance of their activities (the explicit written consent of the partner (s) should be attached)
No
4.
The key risks are identified which would impact on the partner collaboration and they are evaluated in regard of probability of occurrence and degree of impact as adequate response measures are outlined
No
IX. Group
Risks
Criteria Leads to rejection
1.
The main political, institutional and operational risks are identified and analysed
Yes
2.
The probability of arising of risks and their impact on the implementation of the project is identified
Yes
3.
Adequate risk response measures are proposed
Yes
X. Group
Economy, efficiency and effectiveness of expenditure and structured basis of the budget
Criteria Leads to rejection
1.
The budget is set out in detail with the necessary arguments and justification
No
2.
The project expenditures are set for spending during the eligibility period
No
3.
The project expenditures are related to the objectives of the project
Yes
4.
The project expenditures are proportional
Yes
5.
The project expenditures are necessary for the implementation of the project
Yes
6.
The project expenditures are aimed at achieving the objectives of the project only in a manner consistent with the principles of economy, efficiency and effectiveness
Yes
7.
The project expenditures meet the requirements of applicable tax and social legislation
No
8.
There is a compliance and logical connection between the activities and expenditures, as all the costs are fully compliant with the activities envisaged for their implementation
No
9.
The estimated expenditures lead to the timely, quantitative and qualitative implementation of the planned activities and to the achievement of the expected project results
No
10.
The set percentage limits of the different types of project expenditures are observed when establishing the budget
Yes
11.
The set values are planned in line with the expenditures envisaged by activities
Yes
12.
All expenditures are eligible (according to the chapter 8 of the Regulation)
Yes
13.
Expenditures on information and publicity are envisaged under the Regulation and the Information and Publicity Requirements
Yes
14.
The amount of the grant stated in the budget does not exceed the maximum amount, specified under the Application Guidelines
Yes
The project is funded by The technical assistance fund, financed by the financial mechanism of the EEA and the Norwegian financial mechanism 2014-2021