EUMIS 2020

Evaluation criterias

Group

Capacity - The applicant / partner has sufficient capacity to implement the project in accordance with the Application Guidelines

	Criteria	Leads to rejection	Prioritization
1.	Administrative Capacity - The project implementation team is conformed with the specificity and volume of the project activities set out	Yes	No
2.	Beneficiary's financial capacity - The Beneficiary can provide the necessary financing / co-financing for the implementation of the project activities. The financial capacity is evaluated in accordance with the attached Balance sheet and Profit and loss account for the previous financial year	Yes	No
3.	Financial capacity of the partner (s) - Applicable only in cases when the partner (s) spend funds under the project. - Relevant accounting document regulated by the International or National Accounting Standards of the respective member state for the current year - applicable to the foreign partners.	Yes	No
4.	Operational capacity: The Beneficiary has at least 3 years of experience in management / implementation of projects and/or experience in performing activities similar to those included in the project proposal.	Yes	No
5.	Operational capacity of the partner (s): The Partner/s have at least 3 years of experience in management / implementation of projects and / or experience in performing activities similar to those included in the project proposal.	Yes	No

II.

Group

Compliance

	Criteria	Leads to rejection	Prioritization
1.	The formulated specific objectives are in line with the objectives in the Application Guidelines	Yes	No
2.	The objectives set out aim at addressing the needs of the target groups according to the Application Guidelines	Yes	No
3.	There is a clear connection between the project objectives and the envisaged project results	Yes	No
4.	The target groups are specified - their specific characteristics are indicated according to the Application Guidelines	Yes	No
5.	The needs of the target groups are identified.	Yes	No

III.

Group

Methodology and organization

	Criteria	Leads to rejection	Prioritization
1.	The activities aim at achieving the objectives	Yes	No
2.	The expected results from the implementation of the activities will contribute to achievement of the indicators set out in the project	Yes	No
3.	The activities as well as the ways and stages of their implementation are described in detail	Yes	No
4.	At least one innovative practice is identified and / or applied in the activities	Yes	No
5.	The plan for public procurement corresponds to the sequence of the foreseen activities.	Yes	No
6.	The description of the activities indicates start date and duration of each activity	Yes	No
7.	The time coverage of each activity is realistic	Yes	No
8.	There is a logical consistency in the implementation of the activities	Yes	No
9.	Adequate measures for ensuring the sustainability of the project results are foreseen	Yes	No

IV.

Group

Bilateral relationships

	Criteria	Leads to rejection	Prioritization
1.	The partner (s) is involved in the implementation of the activities in accordance with their capacity and commitments	Yes	No
2.	The funds envisaged for spending by the partner (s) meet the requirements of the Eligibility Expenditure Regulation	Yes	No
3.	The funds envisaged for spending by the partner (s) are sufficient for the quality and timely performance of their activities (according to the submitted Partnership agreement/Letter of Intent)	Yes	No
4.	The key risks are identified which would impact on the partner collaboration and they are evaluated in regard of probability of occurrence and degree of impact as adequate response measures are outlined	Yes	No

Group

Risks

Criteria

Leads to rejection

Prioritization

The main political, institutional and operational risks are identified and analysed

Yes

The probability of arising of risks and their impact on the implementation of the project is identified

Yes

Adequate risk response measures are proposed

Yes

VI.

Group

Economy, efficiency and effectiveness of expenditure and structured basis of the budget

	Criteria	Leads to rejection	Prioritization
1.	The budget is set out in detail with the necessary arguments and justification	Yes	No
2.	The project expenditures are set for spending during the eligibility period	Yes	No
3.	The project expenditures are related to the objectives of the project	Yes	No
4.	The project expenditures are proportional	Yes	No
5.	The project expenditures are necessary for the implementation of the project	Yes	No
6.	The project expenditures aim at achieving the objectives of the project only in a manner consistent with the principles of economy, efficiency and effectiveness	Yes	No
7.	The project expenditures meet the requirements of applicable tax and social legislation	Yes	No
8.	There is a compliance and logical connection between the activities and expenditures, as all the costs are fully compliant with the activities envisaged for their implementation	Yes	No
9.	The estimated expenditures lead to the timely, quantitative and qualitative implementation of the planned activities and to the achievement of the expected project results	Yes	No
10.	The set percentage limits of the different types of project expenditures are observed when establishing the budget	Yes	No
11.	The set values are planned in line with the expenditures envisaged by activities	Yes	No
12.	All expenditures are eligible (according to the chapter 8 of the Regulation)	Yes	No
13.	Expenditures on information and publicity are envisaged under the Regulation and the Information and Publicity Requirements	Yes	No

VII.

Group

Conclusion

	Criteria	Leads to rejection	Prioritization
1.	The project is recommended for funding	Yes	No

Year	Survey